Xeon W3520 vs E5-4627 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4627 v4
2016
10 cores / 10 threads, 135 Watt
8.16
+343%
Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84

Xeon E5-4627 v4 outperforms Xeon W3520 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9221991
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.220.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency5.721.34
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,225$404

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 has 369% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads108
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °C68 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAE46 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB24 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 8.16
+343%
Xeon W3520 1.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4627 v4 12969
+344%
Xeon W3520 2924

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.16 1.84
Recency 20 June 2016 30 March 2009
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 10 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E5-4627 v4 has a 343.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon W3520, on the other hand, has 3.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4627 v4 and Xeon W3520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4627 v4
Xeon E5-4627 v4
Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4627 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4627 v4 or Xeon W3520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.