Xeon Platinum 8362 vs E5-4627 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4627 v2
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
5.98
+2.4%
Xeon Platinum 8362
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 265 Watt
5.84

Xeon E5-4627 v2 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11031121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.272.05
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB Intel® Smart Cache48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature88 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt265 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4627 v2 5.98
+2.4%
Xeon Platinum 8362 5.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4627 v2 9320
+2.3%
Xeon Platinum 8362 9107

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.98 5.84
Recency 1 January 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 265 Watt

Xeon E5-4627 v2 has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 103.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8362, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4627 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8362, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2
Xeon E5-4627 v2
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4627 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4627 v2 or Xeon Platinum 8362, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.