i5-13600KF vs Xeon E5-4607 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4607 v2
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.41
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
23.90
+442%

Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E5-4607 v2 by a whopping 442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1336212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.34
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency4.3712.44
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rate6.4 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache15 MB Intel® Smart Cache6 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 4.41
i5-13600KF 23.90
+442%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4607 v2 6986
i5-13600KF 37819
+441%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 23.90
Recency 1 January 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 6 14
Threads 12 20
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-4607 v2 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 442% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 133.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4607 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4607 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4607 v2 and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4607 v2
Xeon E5-4607 v2
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5-4607 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1845 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4607 v2 or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.