Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
15.69
+31.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.93

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking436653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.53no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency10.1932.09
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2230
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size456.12 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C105 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FP6
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-4266
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 15.69
+31.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 24916
+31.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 18946

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 1056
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1438
+36.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 8774
+38.5%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 6333

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.69 11.93
Recency 20 June 2016 7 March 2020
Physical cores 22 8
Threads 44 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has a 31.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 175% more physical cores and 175% more threads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 314.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 4900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 9 4900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 541 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Ryzen 9 4900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.