Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
15.72
+3044%
Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.50

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 3044% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4342889
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency10.261.35
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads442
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 2.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier2217
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache5.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache55 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C100 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 15.72
+3044%
Celeron B820 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 24976
+3014%
Celeron B820 802

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 1032
+269%
Celeron B820 280

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 8575
+1643%
Celeron B820 492

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.72 0.50
Recency 20 June 2016 1 July 2012
Physical cores 22 2
Threads 44 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has a 3044% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron B820, on the other hand, has 314.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron B820 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 546 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 142 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Celeron B820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.