Atom N2600 vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.51no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Atom
Power efficiency10.24no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads444
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache55 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt3.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2.44 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 24916
+6821%
Atom N2600 360

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 1066
+1321%
Atom N2600 75

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 8799
+4090%
Atom N2600 210

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 1 December 2011
Physical cores 22 2
Threads 44 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 3 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v4 has an age advantage of 4 years, 1000% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N2600, on the other hand, has 4733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N2600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Atom N2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 508 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 181 vote

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Atom N2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.