Xeon Gold 6137 vs E5-2699 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
12.87
+5.6%
Xeon Gold 6137
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 205 Watt
12.19

Xeon E5-2699 v3 outperforms Xeon Gold 6137 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking598639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.405.63
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache45 MB (shared)25 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 12.87
+5.6%
Xeon Gold 6137 12.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20436
+5.5%
Xeon Gold 6137 19365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.87 12.19
Recency 8 September 2014 1 July 2017
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and 41.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6137, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon Gold 6137, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Intel Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 900 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6137 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Xeon Gold 6137, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.