Xeon D-1733NT vs E5-2698 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2698 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
14.51
+55.2%
Xeon D-1733NT
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 53 Watt
9.35

Xeon E5-2698 v4 outperforms Xeon D-1733NT by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking490811
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency10.1716.70
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,226no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4016
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L2 cache5 MBno data
L3 cache50 MB15 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB256 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4016
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 14.51
+55.2%
Xeon D-1733NT 9.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2698 v4 23055
+55.3%
Xeon D-1733NT 14849

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.51 9.35
Recency 20 June 2016 1 January 2022
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 40 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 53 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has a 55.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Xeon D-1733NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 154.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1733NT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Xeon D-1733NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4
Intel Xeon D-1733NT
Xeon D-1733NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1733NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v4 or Xeon D-1733NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.