Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking479not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.82no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency10.32no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)11 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,226no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4012
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache50 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size456.12 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 11 October 2019
Physical cores 20 6
Threads 40 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 233.3% more physical cores and 233.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 1600AF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 107.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2698 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v4 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Xeon E5-2698 v4
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 270 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v4 or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.