Xeon Gold 5515+ vs E5-2698 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2698 v3
2014
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
12.10
Xeon Gold 5515+
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 165 Watt
16.41
+35.6%

Xeon Gold 5515+ outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking646412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.88
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.329.24
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache40 MB (shared)22.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size356 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)88 °C76 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA20114677
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2698 v3 12.10
Xeon Gold 5515+ 16.41
+35.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2698 v3 18863
Xeon Gold 5515+ 25587
+35.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.10 16.41
Recency 8 September 2014 14 December 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E5-2698 v3 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5515+, on the other hand, has a 35.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5515+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2698 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2698 v3 and Xeon Gold 5515+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Intel Xeon Gold 5515+
Xeon Gold 5515+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 236 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2698 v3 or Xeon Gold 5515+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.