Xeon Gold 6330N vs E5-2697A v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
14.12
Xeon Gold 6330N
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
23.76
+68.3%

Xeon Gold 6330N outperforms Xeon E5-2697A v4 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking540222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.8813.13
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads3256
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache40 MB42 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °C86 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size1.5 TB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 14.12
Xeon Gold 6330N 23.76
+68.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21603
Xeon Gold 6330N 36360
+68.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.12 23.76
Recency 20 June 2016 1 April 2021
Physical cores 16 28
Threads 32 56
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 13.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6330N, on the other hand, has a 68.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6330N is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6330N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
Intel Xeon Gold 6330N
Xeon Gold 6330N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 248 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6330N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or Xeon Gold 6330N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.