EPYC 7662 vs Xeon E5-2697 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.68
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
47.24
+245%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v4 by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking56242
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.74no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.6019.14
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,702no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads36128
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2320
L1 cacheno data4 MB
L2 cache4.5 MB32 MB
L3 cache45 MB256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 13.68
EPYC 7662 47.24
+245%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 20934
EPYC 7662 72298
+245%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.68 47.24
Recency 20 June 2016 19 February 2020
Physical cores 18 64
Threads 36 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v4 has 55.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has a 245.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 255.6% more physical cores and 255.6% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v4 and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Xeon E5-2697 v4
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 211 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v4 or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.