Xeon W-3323 vs E5-2697 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
11.62
Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
17.52
+50.8%

Xeon W-3323 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking674362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.587.54
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2824
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °C84 °C
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 11.62
Xeon W-3323 17.52
+50.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18458
Xeon W-3323 27822
+50.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.62 17.52
Recency 8 September 2014 29 July 2021
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 28 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 220 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads, and 51.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3323, on the other hand, has a 50.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3323 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon W-3323, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 688 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Xeon W-3323, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.