C-60 vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking660not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Power efficiency7.64no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm40 nm
Die size356 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18586
+5782%
C-60 316

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 1094
+1339%
C-60 76

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 7461
+5307%
C-60 138

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 22 August 2011
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 9 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has an age advantage of 3 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

C-60, on the other hand, has 1511.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v3 is a server/workstation processor while C-60 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 650 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 240 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.