Xeon Platinum 9242 vs E5-2696 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 431 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 9.87 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 22 (Docosa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 44 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 22 | 23 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 5.5 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 55 MB | 71.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 8 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA5903 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 12 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 281.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 22 | 48 |
| Threads | 44 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 133.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 9242, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 118.2% more physical cores and 118.2% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Xeon Platinum 9242, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
