Celeron 540 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.87no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)no data
Threads44no data
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L2 cache5.5 MBno data
L3 cache55 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 24862
+8051%
Celeron 540 305

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 1121
+523%
Celeron 540 180

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 9022
+4969%
Celeron 540 178

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 v4 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 540, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 540 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Celeron 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
Intel Celeron 540
Celeron 540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 356 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 16 votes

Rate Celeron 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 v4 or Celeron 540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.