Xeon Phi 7210 vs E5-2696 V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.84
+201%
Xeon Phi 7210
2016
64 cores / 256 threads, 215 Watt
4.60

Xeon E5-2696 V3 outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5361301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.032.02
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads36256
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-33647
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 13.84
+201%
Xeon Phi 7210 4.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 21986
+201%
Xeon Phi 7210 7306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.84 4.60
Recency 8 September 2014 20 June 2016
Physical cores 18 64
Threads 36 256
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 215 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has a 200.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 48.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 255.6% more physical cores and 611.1% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Phi 7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
Intel Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon Phi 7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1233 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Xeon Phi 7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.