Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2696 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
14.16
+230%
Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.29

Xeon E5-2696 V3 outperforms Opteron 6380 by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5271374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.59
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.073.46
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)5 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
Socket2011-3G34
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.16
+230%
Opteron 6380 4.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 22073
+230%
Opteron 6380 6687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 1134
+173%
Opteron 6380 415

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 8101
+153%
Opteron 6380 3208

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.16 4.29
Recency 8 September 2014 5 November 2012
Physical cores 18 16
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has a 230.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 12.5% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6380, on the other hand, has 26.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Opteron 6380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1201 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or Opteron 6380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.