i9-13900F vs Xeon E5-2695 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 115 Watt
8.37
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.15
+284%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking909126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5057.35
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.8546.56
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,950$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 3723% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 8.37
i9-13900F 32.15
+284%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 13296
i9-13900F 51074
+284%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 440
i9-13900F 2788
+534%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 3935
i9-13900F 17407
+342%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.37 32.15
Recency 1 September 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900F has a 284.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2695 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 96 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 157 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v2 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.