Xeon E5-2686 V3 vs E5-2690 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 135 Watt
12.26
+7.4%
Xeon E5-2686 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 120 Watt
11.42

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2686 V3 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking621681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.98no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.599.01
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads2836
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size306.18 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA20112011-3
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.26
+7.4%
Xeon E5-2686 V3 11.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19471
+7.3%
Xeon E5-2686 V3 18148

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.26 11.42
Recency 20 June 2016 8 September 2014
Physical cores 14 18
Threads 28 36
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2686 V3, on the other hand, has 28.6% more physical cores and 28.6% more threads, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Xeon E5-2686 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2686 V3
Xeon E5-2686 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1658 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2686 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Xeon E5-2686 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.