Atom x5-E3930 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 135 Watt
10.45
+1642%
Atom x5-E3930
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.60

Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 1642% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7512801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency7.198.57
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)26 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v3 10.45
+1642%
Atom x5-E3930 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 v3 16293
+1656%
Atom x5-E3930 928

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.45 0.60
Recency 8 September 2014 26 October 2016
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v3 has a 1641.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v3 and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1027 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v3 or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.