Threadripper PRO 7995WX vs Xeon E5-2689
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1063 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Xeon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.14 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 16 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | 12x 71 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,270 million | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 2011 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 96 |
| Threads | 16 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon E5-2689 has 204.3% lower power consumption.
Threadripper PRO 7995WX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Threadripper PRO 7995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
