Xeon Silver 4109T vs E5-2687W v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2687W v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 160 Watt
11.22
+71.6%
Xeon Silver 4109T
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.54

Xeon E5-2687W v4 outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6901043
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.426.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency6.618.80
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,141$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4109T has 159% better value for money than Xeon E5-2687W v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier3020
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache3 MB8 MB
L3 cache30 MB11 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature76 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1.5 TB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2687W v4 11.22
+71.6%
Xeon Silver 4109T 6.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2687W v4 17755
+71.6%
Xeon Silver 4109T 10348

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.22 6.54
Recency 20 June 2016 11 July 2017
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 70 Watt

Xeon E5-2687W v4 has a 71.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4109T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4109T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Xeon Silver 4109T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
Xeon E5-2687W v4
Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 57 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2687W v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2687W v4 or Xeon Silver 4109T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.