Atom N570 vs Xeon E5-2687W v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking689not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.64no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,141$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s666 MHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB2 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2687W v4 17832
+5129%
Atom N570 341

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2687W v4 1108
+1251%
Atom N570 82

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2687W v4 7872
+3528%
Atom N570 217

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 1 March 2011
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon E5-2687W v4 has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N570, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2687W v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2687W v4 and Atom N570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
Xeon E5-2687W v4
Intel Atom N570
Atom N570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 57 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2687W v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2687W v4 or Atom N570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.