Apple M1 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
11.77
+128%

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6641206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency9.28no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cache4 MB16 MB
L3 cache40 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Number of transistors7200 Million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 11.77
+128%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 18702
+128%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.77 5.17
Recency 20 June 2016 10 November 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 133 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2249 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.