A10-7300 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2682 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
12.45
+992%

Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms A10-7300 by a whopping 992% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6332393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency9.465.47
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L2 cache4 MB4096 KB
L3 cache40 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size456.12 mm2245 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP3
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 12.45
+992%
A10-7300 1.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2682 v4 19051
+994%
A10-7300 1742

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.45 1.14
Recency 20 June 2016 4 June 2014
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 19 Watt

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has a 992.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A10-7300, on the other hand, has 531.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while A10-7300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and A10-7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
AMD A10-7300
A10-7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 131 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 76 votes

Rate A10-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2682 v4 or A10-7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.