Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.15
+91.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.83

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6941110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.79no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads288
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB384 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB2048 KB
L3 cache35 MB4096 KB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C95 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.15
+91.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 5.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17710
+91.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G 9259

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 5.83
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 91.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3994 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.