Phenom II X3 N830 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.15
+1493%
Phenom II X3 N830
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Phenom II X3 N830 by a whopping 1493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6952706
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency8.791.89
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads283
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache3.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011S1
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX286x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.15
+1493%
Phenom II X3 N830 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17714
+1500%
Phenom II X3 N830 1107

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1019
+279%
Phenom II X3 N830 269

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6908
+828%
Phenom II X3 N830 744

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+104%
Phenom II X3 N830 1817

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+524%
Phenom II X3 N830 4954

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+244%
Phenom II X3 N830 2412

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 18
+892%
Phenom II X3 N830 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 0.70
Recency 20 June 2016 12 May 2010
Physical cores 14 3
Threads 28 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 1492.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 366.7% more physical cores and 833.3% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X3 N830, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 N830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X3 N830 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Phenom II X3 N830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Phenom II X3 N830
Phenom II X3 N830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4036 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 37 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Phenom II X3 N830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.