Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.15
+177%
Opteron 6282 SE
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
4.02

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Opteron 6282 SE by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6941409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.940.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.792.72
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$1,090

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 425% better value for money than Opteron 6282 SE.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB768 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB16 MB
L3 cache35 MB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2316 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA2011G34
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.15
+177%
Opteron 6282 SE 4.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17711
+177%
Opteron 6282 SE 6385

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 4.02
Recency 20 June 2016 14 November 2011
Physical cores 14 16
Threads 28 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 140 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 177.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 75% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6282 SE, on the other hand, has 14.3% more physical cores.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6282 SE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Opteron 6282 SE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Opteron 6282 SE
Opteron 6282 SE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3971 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6282 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Opteron 6282 SE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.