Atom 230 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking695not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency8.79no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$29

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIFSB
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier2412
L1 cache448 KB56 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C85 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17710
+10379%
Atom 230 169

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+566%
Atom 230 557

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+3534%
Atom 230 851

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 2 April 2008
Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has an age advantage of 8 years, 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 230, on the other hand, has 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom 230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4012 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.