Athlon X4 750 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.52
+578%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Athlon X4 750 by a whopping 578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6712036
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.62no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB192K
L2 cache3.5 MB4 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FM2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.52
+578%
Athlon X4 750 1.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17762
+577%
Athlon X4 750 2625

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.52 1.70
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 577.6% higher aggregate performance score, 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X4 750, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X4 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Athlon X4 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Athlon X4 750
Athlon X4 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3684 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Athlon X4 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.