Xeon E7-4809 v3 vs E5-2678 v3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 818 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Xeon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.31 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| Release date | 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | 160 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 5,560 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 4 |
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 115 Watt |
Xeon E5-2678 v3 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Xeon E7-4809 v3, on the other hand, has 4.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Xeon E7-4809 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
