Ryzen Threadripper 1998X vs Xeon E5-2678 v3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 815 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Xeon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.30 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 2015 (9 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,560 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 0 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X has 33.3% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1998X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Ryzen Threadripper 1998X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
