Opteron 242 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 820 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Xeon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.32 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | 2015 (9 years ago) | April 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,560 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 85 Watt |
Xeon E5-2678 v3 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 242, on the other hand, has 41.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and Opteron 242, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
