3020e vs Xeon E5-2678 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2678 v3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
9.27
+506%

Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms 3020e by a whopping 506% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8272139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency7.3124.13
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache3072 KB1 MB
L3 cache30 MB4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketLGA2011-3FT5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 9.27
+506%
3020e 1.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 14729
+505%
3020e 2433

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 1015
+53.6%
3020e 661

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2678 v3 6760
+527%
3020e 1079

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 1.53
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2678 v3 has a 505.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

3020e, on the other hand, has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2678 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2678 v3 is a server/workstation processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2678 v3 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
Xeon E5-2678 v3
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2416 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2678 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2678 v3 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.