Pro A6-8500B vs Xeon E5-2676 V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2676 V3
2015
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.51
+743%
Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.01

Xeon E5-2676 V3 outperforms Pro A6-8500B by a whopping 743% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8862453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency6.716.37
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateJune 2015 (9 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Number of transistors2,600 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket2011-3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Number of pipelinesno data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 8.51
+743%
Pro A6-8500B 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2676 V3 13524
+745%
Pro A6-8500B 1601

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.51 1.01
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2676 V3 has a 742.6% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A6-8500B, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2676 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A6-8500B in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2676 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Pro A6-8500B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2676 V3 and Pro A6-8500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3
Xeon E5-2676 V3
AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 131 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2676 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2676 V3 or Pro A6-8500B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.