Apple M2 vs Xeon E5-2675 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2675 V3
2014
16 cores / 32 threads, 110 Watt
8.46
Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.58
+13.2%

Apple M2 outperforms Xeon E5-2675 V3 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking904807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency7.1444.49
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.48 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)20 MB
L3 cache40 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million20000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket2011-3no data
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2675 V3 8.46
Apple M2 9.58
+13.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2675 V3 13180
Apple M2 14933
+13.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.46 9.58
Recency 8 September 2014 10 June 2022
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 20 Watt

Xeon E5-2675 V3 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M2, on the other hand, has a 13.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 340% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2675 V3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2675 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2675 V3 and Apple M2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2675 V3
Xeon E5-2675 V3
Apple M2
M2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2675 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 595 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2675 V3 or Apple M2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.