Xeon E5-2699R v4 vs E5-2673 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking576not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.11no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,560

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads4044
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIQPI
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier2322
L2 cache5 MB5.5 MB
L3 cache50 MB55 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2456.12 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size1,536 GB1,536 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 25 October 2016
Physical cores 20 22
Threads 40 44
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 145 Watt

Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 7.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699R v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 10% more physical cores and 10% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2673 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Xeon E5-2699R v4 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 v4 and Xeon E5-2699R v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
Xeon E5-2673 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2699R v4
Xeon E5-2699R v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 121 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2673 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699R v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2673 v4 or Xeon E5-2699R v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.