Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.56
+765%
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99

Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 765% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8832464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.93no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core 2 Quad
Power efficiency6.752.08
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589$348

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s1066 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.56
+765%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13591
+763%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 943
+244%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 5967
+781%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.56 0.99
Recency 8 September 2014 1 January 2009
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has a 764.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9000, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Core 2 Quad Q9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5564 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Core 2 Quad Q9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.