Celeron N4020 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
8.71
+780%
Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.99

Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8802475
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency6.7415.33
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s15 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB4 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes406
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 8.71
+780%
Celeron N4020 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13583
+777%
Celeron N4020 1549

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 943
+175%
Celeron N4020 343

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 5973
+992%
Celeron N4020 547

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.71 0.99
Recency 8 September 2014 4 November 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has a 779.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Celeron N4020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2670 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N4020 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5530 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1765 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.