A4-3305M vs Xeon E5-2670 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking882not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.74no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FS1
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX23DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 13589
+1709%
A4-3305M 751

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 943
+300%
A4-3305M 236

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2670 v3 5966
+1553%
A4-3305M 361

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 14 June 2011
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v3 has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A4-3305M, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v3 is a server/workstation processor while A4-3305M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v3 and A4-3305M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Xeon E5-2670 v3
AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5541 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v3 or A4-3305M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.