i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-2670 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670 v2
2013
10 cores / 20 threads, 115 Watt
7.17
Core i5-1335UE
2023
10 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
7.53
+5%

Core i5-1335UE outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking988963
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.8847.31
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$927no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 v2 7.17
i5-1335UE 7.53
+5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2670 v2 11347
i5-1335UE 11921
+5.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.17 7.53
Recency 1 September 2013 4 January 2023
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2670 v2 has 66.7% more threads.

i5-1335UE, on the other hand, has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-1335UE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 v2 and Core i5-1335UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
Xeon E5-2670 v2
Intel Core i5-1335UE
Core i5-1335UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 849 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core i5-1335UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 v2 or Core i5-1335UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.