Celeron 3755U vs Xeon E5-2667

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2667
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.72
+538%
Celeron 3755U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.74

Xeon E5-2667 outperforms Celeron 3755U by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12622658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.21no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.444.67
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$714$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2667 4.72
+538%
Celeron 3755U 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 7492
+534%
Celeron 3755U 1182

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 0.74
Recency 6 March 2012 1 March 2015
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2667 has a 537.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron 3755U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2667 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3755U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3755U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 and Celeron 3755U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667
Xeon E5-2667
Intel Celeron 3755U
Celeron 3755U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 78 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 3755U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 or Celeron 3755U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.