i3-350M vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2667 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
8.71
+1181%
Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.68

Xeon E5-2667 v4 outperforms Core i3-350M by a whopping 1181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8672718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core i3
Power efficiency6.111.84
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,057$130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.27 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 1.0
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier3217
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache25 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors3200 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 8.71
+1181%
i3-350M 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 13833
+1174%
i3-350M 1086

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 1178
+302%
i3-350M 293

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 6533
+1000%
i3-350M 594

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.71 0.68
Recency 20 June 2016 7 January 2010
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2667 v4 has a 1180.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

i3-350M, on the other hand, has 285.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-350M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i3-350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1279 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 264 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 v4 or Core i3-350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.