Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Xeon E5-2666 V3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 854 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Transmeta Crusoe |
| Power efficiency | 6.28 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Crusoe (2001) |
| Release date | 13 November 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 June 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 25 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | 55 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | 36.8 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 2011-3 | CBGA-474 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 November 2014 | 1 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 1 |
| Threads | 20 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 7 Watt |
Xeon E5-2666 V3 has an age advantage of 13 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 1828.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2666 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2666 V3 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
