A8-4500M vs Xeon E5-2666 V3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2666 V3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 135 Watt
8.93
+742%
A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06

Xeon E5-2666 V3 outperforms A8-4500M by a whopping 742% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8582417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.262.87
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date13 November 2014 (10 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors2,600 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelunknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7640G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2666 V3 8.93
+742%
A8-4500M 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2666 V3 14191
+740%
A8-4500M 1689

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.93 1.06
Recency 13 November 2014 15 May 2012
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2666 V3 has a 742.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A8-4500M, on the other hand, has 285.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2666 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-4500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2666 V3 is a server/workstation processor while A8-4500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2666 V3 and A8-4500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2666 V3
Xeon E5-2666 V3
AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3123 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2666 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 316 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2666 V3 or A8-4500M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.