FirePro A300 vs Xeon E5-2660 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.87no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.00no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,445no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cacheno data192K
L2 cache3.5 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FM2
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataFirePro

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 7 August 2012
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2660 v4 has an age advantage of 3 years, 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro A300, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2660 v4 is a server/workstation processor while FirePro A300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v4 and FirePro A300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Xeon E5-2660 v4
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 238 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2660 v4 or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.