E2-9000 vs Xeon E5-2660 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2660 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
9.99
+1538%
E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61

Xeon E5-2660 v4 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 1538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7682788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency9.005.77
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,445no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L2 cache3.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size306.18 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C90 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Virtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2660 v4 9.99
+1538%
E2-9000 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2660 v4 15873
+1541%
E2-9000 967

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.99 0.61
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2660 v4 has a 1537.7% higher aggregate performance score, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

E2-9000, on the other hand, has 950% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2660 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2660 v4 is a server/workstation processor while E2-9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v4 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Xeon E5-2660 v4
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 239 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 312 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2660 v4 or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.