Core i5-13400E vs Xeon E5-2660 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 721 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.25 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Raptor Lake-S |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,445 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3.5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 35 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 10 |
| Threads | 28 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2660 v4 has 40% more physical cores and 75% more threads.
i5-13400E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2660 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v4 and Core i5-13400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
