FX-4100 vs Xeon E5-2658

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
3.82
+132%
FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.65

Xeon E5-2658 outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14602071
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.811.64
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)12 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,462no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100.

PCIe version3.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 3.82
+132%
FX-4100 1.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 6073
+132%
FX-4100 2618

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.82 1.65
Recency 6 March 2012 12 October 2011
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4

Xeon E5-2658 has a 131.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon E5-2658 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E5-2658
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 892 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.